American Values Are…®

  • Home
  • About
  • Policies
  • Discussion Guides
    • Accountability . . . IS an American Value®
    • Free Speech . . . IS an American Value®
    • Interdependence . . . IS an American Value®
    • Public Education . . . IS an American Value®
    • Tolerance . . . IS an American Value®
    • Hate . . . is NOT an American Value®
    • Mendacity . . . is NOT an American Value®
  • Pages

    • About
    • Accountability . . . IS an American Value®
    • Discussion Guides
    • Free Speech . . . IS an American Value®
    • Hate . . . is NOT an American Value®
    • Interdependence . . . IS an American Value®
    • Mendacity . . . is NOT an American Value®
    • Policies
    • Public Education . . . IS an American Value®
    • Tolerance . . . IS an American Value®
  • Categories

    • Civic Engagement
    • Culture
    • Dialogue
    • Education
    • Political Participation
    • Resources
  • Copyright

    © American Values Are, LLC and americanvaluesare.wordpress.com, 2010-2011. Unauthorized use or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this blog’s author or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to American Values Are, LLC and americanvaluesare.wordpress.com with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Can I Trust What I Read On The Internet?

August 14, 2018 — sjr

The guide below was prepared to help inform readers about using the Internet as a source for discussions. It was put together several years ago by Rachel Brekhus, Humanities Reference Librarian at Ellis Library, University of Missouri-Columbia.


When you find a website with interesting information, don’t trust it automatically.  There is no guarantee that anyone is checking websites for accuracy.  Even sites with basically accurate facts might be selective about WHICH facts they mention, which can also produce distorted information.  You might use these sites, but you may need others to balance them.  Even sites whose information was good  when it was first put up can get out of date.

When you want to use a website, look for an author. This can be a person or an organization such as a university, a “think tank,” a church, or a person affiliated with an organization. Questions to ask about all websites:

  • Who puts up the information? (see further questions below)
  • What’s the motive for putting up the information (see further questions below)
  • How often is the site updated? Good websites should indicate this.

Questions to ask about personal authors:

  • Are they experts in the subject they’re writing about?
    • Ph.D. or Master’s degree in something is a good start, but make sure the credential is for the basic subject they’re talking about. “Fellow” of an institute is not, in itself, a qualification. Anyone can be hired as a “fellow.”
    • If the person is a reporter or other non-expert, do they show some awareness of what experts think?
  • Will they suffer consequences if they tell lies or make factual errors? Journalists in major newspapers usually will. Bloggers may or may not.
  • Do they have a commercial motive to say or not say certain things?
    • is the website owned by a company that sells the product, or a competing product? It probably won’t put up information that will drive its customers away from its products.

The last three questions have to do with organizations authors belong to – they are why you should find out more about the organizations.

Questions to ask about organizations:

Is accurate, reliable information the main selling point or (newspapers, universities, some institutes)?

Do they exist in order to provide information with a particular viewpoint or change people’s minds on a particular issue? (think tanks, some institutes, religious sites)? Look for this information on the organization’s home page and look for what others say about them.

There are also questions that have to do with how the website works. How does the information get there? If there’s a single author or organization who puts up all the information, you can ask the above questions. It’s more complex with blogs, online groups (like Yahoo or Myspace groups) and wikis (like Wikipedia). Some blogs and groups, and all wikis, allow all members to post to the site, or at least edit existing content. Wikis can be especially tricky, because information that might look “definite” or “permanent” might be totally changed if you look at it a few days, or even a few minutes later.

Questions to ask about group-authored sites:

  • Is membership/ability to post restricted to certain people? Which people? Does this make you trust the posted content more or less?
  • Is there any concern with maintaining “quality control?” Is there an editor, or a “reputation” system, and how does that work?
  • In wikis, where do you go to look at earlier versions of the page and see why it was changed?

 

Posted in Civic Engagement, Education, Resources. Tags: Civic Engagement, Education, Literacy, Resources, students. 1 Comment »

Focusing on the Structure of Engagement

September 29, 2009 — Dave L Overfelt

It is surprisingly important to establish a structure for citizen engagement.  Without a structure, your engagement process can become easily derailed, becoming nothing more than a venting session.  I recently sat through one of these sessions as an observer.  While I was happy to see several different groups of people normally opposed to each other in the same space, it was disappointing to see that there was no purpose or forward movement to this “dialogue” session.  It is certainly good to let people air their grievances and begin to understand each other but if the process doesn’t aim toward resolution then nothing positive can come of it and the energy to tackle the issue at hand can dissipate.

As we mentioned in the last post, we have looked at some of the specific steps that can be taken in working toward resolution and we have created this presentation for The Communications Center, Inc. This describes our addition to the two Public Agenda’s and The Harwood Institute’s tools, a list of “Ways of Working Toward Resolution”.  In addition to focusing on the endpoint of a deliberative process, we include possible methods that communities can use to build the relationships they need for sustained dialogues and to reach sustainable resolutions.  We invite your feedback.

If you have trouble with the powerpoint, make sure you are clicking on “Read Only” or download this pdf version without any of the nice animation.  Sorry OpenOffice users, still no support for password protected ppt files so you will have to use the pdf.

Posted in Civic Engagement, Political Participation. Tags: Civic Engagement, Culture, Dialogue, Engagement, Political Culture. 1 Comment »
Proudly powered by WordPress
  • Blogroll

    • Listening Circle Facilitators Guide
  • Dialogue Pages

    • American Values Are…Ⓡ
  • Archives

    • October 2018
    • August 2018
    • March 2017
    • June 2010
    • December 2009
    • October 2009
    • September 2009
    • July 2009
    • June 2009
    • April 2009
    • February 2009
    • December 2008
    • November 2008
    • October 2008
    • September 2008
  • Misc

    • Register
    • Log in
    • WordPress.org
    • Blog at WordPress.com.
  • Follow Following
    • American Values Are...®
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • American Values Are...®
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar